Dietary Electrolytes consideration while formulating with alternate ingredients

The current situation is demanding use of alternate ingredients to optimize cost. Feed when formulated with alternate ingredients, there are few things which at times becomes critical and effect broiler performance. Variation in quality of alternate ingredient, ANF (anti-nutritional factors) limitation is really of big concern while formulating with these and we have discussed many a times in Poultry nutrition bites. One parameter which is generally overlooked with use of alternate ingredients in formulation is the electrolyte balance of finished feed.

Na, Cl, K and S elements are important:

Sodium (Na), Chloride (Cl), Potassium (K) and Sulphur (S) are the elements involved in the acid base equilibrium in the bird’s body. In addition, they play important roles in the normal metabolic function of the body, for example, Na is required for the absorption of both glucose and most amino acids. Na and Cl are both contained in normal table salt and K occurs widely in plant material. Small amounts of each of these elements are critical for the well-being of all animals. Since they cannot be synthesized by the bird, they are construed to be essential in dietary terms. In large amounts, they have a deleterious effect.

Standards of Na, Cl and K for optimum performance:

The normal salt level used in broiler feed is 0.2-0.5% (2-5kg/ton). This is always an easy item for a practitioner to check on when evaluating a formulation. Bear in mind, however sometimes sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate or sodium sulphate are used as a Na source. When birds are deprived of salts, the symptoms are stunted growth, extreme agitation, and cannibalism. If Cl is deficient poor growth and mortalities are seen, with animals showing nervous symptoms, tetany, and excessive hyperirritability to external stimuli. If either Na or K levels are increased, the requirement for the other ion is automatically increased. Some of the standard recommendation of Na, Cl and K levels in finished feed as listed as follow.

Table 1
Some standard recommendation of Na, Cl and K levels in finished feed

Chickens are tolerant of high salt levels in the feed, provided that an adequate amount of drinking water is available. The salt levels in the birds drinking water can be important. If the levels are excessive, then the levels are excessive, then the levels of salt in the feed need to be reduced. Only at levels of greater than 3% of salt in the diet is there growth retardation with reduced feed efficiency. When an excess of salt is fed, birds will show muscular weakness and on post-mortem examination, impaction of the crop and dark colored liver will be observed. In addition, diets high in salt predispose the birds to increased incidences of ascites (water belly) due to increased blood pressure.

Deficiency of K is extremely rare. It is difficult to formulate a ration with a level below 0.4-0.5%. High levels of K cause gastric irritation and wet droppings, a condition that is fairly common in the case of diets containing high levels of soya bean meal.

Chloride levels can be reduced, although most species have requirement of around 1.2-1.5g/kg of diet, below which deficiency symptoms may develop. Care must be taken to meet the minimum Cl requirement when, for example, sodium bicarbonate replaces salt in a diet. Current understanding is that the bicarbonate ion is useful in assisting the bird to overcome the negative effects of heat stress, rather than the fact that it does not contain Cl.

Practical formulating tips:

  • Keep Na levels on higher side, this helps in high feed and water intake especially for Indian summers.
  • While limiting Cl, the levels shouldn’t go below 0.16%. There is no direct bad effect of excess Cl.
  • For optimization use Salt at around 2.5kg/ton and balance the remaining with Soda or other Na salts when formulating with veg ingredients.
  • Use of bicarbonates (soda) helps to overcome effects of heat stress.

dEB or CAD or DCAB levels:

Dietary electrolyte balance (dEB), also known as cation-anion difference (CAD) or dietary cation-anion balance (DCAB), is calculated using only the monovalent ions of sodium, potassium, and chlorine. A more comprehensive estimate, however, considers the contribution of divalent ions of calcium, magnesium, sulfur, and phosphorus, but it is used less frequently because it requires more chemical analyses. For all practical purposes, the following equation is sufficient under most commercial conditions:

dEB (mEq/kg) = 1,000 ´[Na(g/kg)/23 + K(g/kg)/39 – Cl(g/kg)/35.5]

In broilers, an electrolyte imbalance can cause tibial dyschondroplasia, which may affect the metabolism of a number of essential amino acids in particular lysine and arginine. In most situations, it seems as through an overall diet balance of 250 mEq/kg is optimal for normal physiological function, although the range of published figure varies from 200-350 mEq/kg.

While it is true that overall electrolyte balance is of major importance, it appears to be most critical when Cl levels are high. Low dietary Cl levels often have little response to the manipulation of electrolyte balance, but when diet Cl is elevated, it seems critical to make the adjustments to the diet cations such that overall balance is maintained. Bear in mind that microbial fermentation can be impacted on by the DCAB in its environment. It may be true that the bird can self-regulate its own DCAB, but it cannot alter the DCAB of the digesta in the intestine. Feed changes, along with changes in the DCAB, may have a negative impact on the gut microflora and gut health.

Practical formulating tips:

  • dEB is important for gut health and microbial fermentation.
  • Formulating with dEB levels above 200 in summer always helps but the vice-versa may not be always true.

S levels are very critical when formulating with alternate ingredients:

The 1994 NRC lists the toxic level of S as 14g/kg in poultry; however, this is based on data from 1960. Lesson and summers demonstrated that broiler performance was retarded when high levels of dietary S were present in feed. Raw materials such as canola meal and maize DDGS are relatively high in S. If high levels of supplementation of trace minerals (in sulphate form) are added, and crystalline Lysine in form of Lysine sulphate is used instead of Lysine HCl, then the levels for optimum broiler performance might be exceeded.

More recently, researchers showed that feed intake in broilers was significantly reduced when dietary S levels reached 3.6g/kg using copper and zinc sulphate at supplementation levels of 255 and 1363 mg/kg respectively. However, broiler performance was not affected at these levels. Some nutritionist use sodium sulphate as an alternative to sodium bicarbonate. It may be cheaper but its molecular weight of 32.5, S will change the DCAB to some extent. While it may not do any harm, it is difficult to see any real benefit from this practice. Commercial nutritionists are becoming concerned that, as we reduce the protein levels of our diets and possibly use more Lysine sulphate, there is a danger that we may exceed safe upper limits.

Practical formulating tips:

  • S levels are critical and needs to be monitored, levels going above 0.3% may affect performance.
  • Rapeseed meal, DDGS, Poultry meal, Fish meal and DORB are high in sulphur.
  • S coming from Lysine Suphate needs to be considered.
  • S coming from Sulphate form of minerals also needs to be considered.
  • Formulating low protein diet with alternate ingredients at times aggravates the issue due to high S levels in finished feed.

For references, questions and feedback write to Novel Life Consultants, Bangalore (India). Email id is novellife.bangalore@gmail.com and contact no Landline +91- 80-41326221 Mob- +91 9611337444)

Novel Life Consultant(This article is a work of Novel Life Consultant and is for public information purpose only. This has been written to share knowledge on poultry nutrition and is not a legal information or statement. Reference to any specific product or entity doesn’t constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the company. The views expressed by the writer are their own and their appearance does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent.)

References: -
Bobeck, E., Payne, R.L., Kerr, B.J. and Persia, M.E. 2013. Supplemental lysine sulfate does not negatively affect the performance of broiler chicks fed dietary sulphur from multiple dietary and water source. JAPR, 22:461-461
Borges, S.A., De Oliveira, J., Fischer da Silva, A.V. and Dos Santos, T.T.2011. Use of electrolytes for birds-the practice of theory. In Proceedings of 22nd APSS
Lesson, S. and Summers, J.D. 2005. Commercial Poultry Nutrition, 3rd Ed. Guelph Ontario, Canada: University Books.
Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: Ninth Revised Edition, 1994
Rick Kleyn and Peter Chrystal 2020. Broiler Nutrition Masterclass, First Ed. British Library, England: Context Publisher 2020

Similar article: Feasible Solutions To Cater High Ingredient Price

Its April and summer heat has started. For broiler farmers in India, summer management of poultry is all about Fans, Foggers, Sprinklers, Curtain management, Space management, feeding time, Feeder lifting, Electrolyte supplementation, Mortality control etc. Ambient temperature for rearing birds is 24 to 26°C. Temperature above that gradually induces stress. Intensity of stress increases proportionately with increase in temperature. Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) weight, activity including enzyme secretion, enzymatic activity, nutrient absorptive surface area and villi dimensions are reduced significantly due to intense heat stress. According to studies done, body weight is reduced by approximately 15-20 % with an increase in 10°C than ambient temperature. Also, there is 5 % reduction in feed intake for every 1°C rise in temperature between 32-38°C.

Apart from managing the house temperature, there is also a requirement to make changes in the nutrition and formulation of birds for summers. In this article, we will be covering different practical changes in feed formulation for broiler diets in summer.

Increase DAA levels of diets

Bird utilizes much more amino acids during heat stress. Supplementation of good quality protein rich raw materials with higher digestibility is required in summers. Ideal protein formulation with digestible amino acid levels suits perfectly for summers. For summers, the digestible amino acid levels need to be increased 3-5%. Cost of this addition can be minimized either by use of cost effective local available ingredients or by including a Multi-Protease in the diets. Cost of Multi-Protease can be easily adjusted by considering 0.2% CP or 1% DAA matrix. Incorporation of good Multi-Protease enzyme is most ideal to reduce amino acid variability, protein wastage, litter ammonia and stress. It will balance all essential amino acids, optimize performance, and reduce cost of production.

Apart from this, deficiency of arginine and lysine increases heat load which must be taken care of in feed formulations. Additional fortification of Lysine, Methionine, Lysine to Arginine ratio will ensure better breast meat yield in summer stress. Arginine, Tryptophan, Valine and Glutamine are known for their direct/ indirect response to immunomodulation and feed intake.

Formulation Tips

  • Increase Digestible Amino Acid levels of diet by 3-5%
  • Use either protein ingredients to increase amino acids or Multi-Protease
  • Multi-Protease is cost effective way to optimize Amino acids without change in diet
  • Breakeven point of Multi-Protease comes at 1% DAA or 0.2% CP replacement
  • Lysine, Methionine, Arginine, Tryptophan, Valine and Glutamine levels are important

Feed1

Increase AME of diet

During summer feed intake will drop due to stress and limited feeding hours. To compensate nutrient requirement, it is suggested to increase the AME of diets by 40-50 Kcal/kg. And this increment is suggested to be provided through fat/oil. Increasing fat levels in diet generally reduces digesta passage time and optimizes absorption of nutrients. Fat metabolism also has the lowest heat increment ensuring body cooling effects. Good quality fat and oil also enhance palatability and optimizes finished feed energy levels. If Me is enhanced by use of grains and oil seed meal, it’s better to make sure Non-Starch Polysaccharides levels are within limits. These Anti-nutritional factors increase gut viscosity and may result in feed passage. If these levels are high use of a good thermostable Xylanase, Beta-Glucanase, Mannanase, Cellulase and Amylase can help.

Formulation Tips

  • Increase AME of diet through oil by 40-50 kcal/kg
  • Use good quality oil with Antioxidants and Emulsifier
  • Select oil based on Lipid Evaluation Test (MIU, FFA, PV, FA Profile and AME calculation)
  • Use thermostable Multi-NSP enzymes if ME is increased through grains and oilseeds

Dietary Electrolyte Balance (DEB) Impact

DEB is calculated as (% of Na/ 23 + % of K/39.1 – % of Cl/35.5) * 10,000 Where 23, 39.1 & 35.5 denotes atomic weight of each Na, K & Cl electrolytes respectively and 10,000 is the multiplication factor. We have observed a severe bicarbonate ion (NaHCO3) loss during summer stress & respiratory alkalosis. Increase of NaHCO3 in diets are recommended to control the loss and reduce stress. Keeping optimum DEB in summer is essential for better feed intake, day gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR), osmotic balance and effective evaporative cooling of body to relieve stress. Increased DEB by 10 to 15% in summer is recommended than winter. Use of potassium chloride (KCl), ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), NaHCO3 along with regularly used NaCl will help in attaining desired levels of DEB. Practically, the DEB levels are kept more than 220 during summers. Na comes in diet from Salt, Soda bicarbonate, MBM, Fish meal and K comes from Soya and other salts. In a well-balanced diet with high soya and MBM DEB is never a challenge. Challenge comes when lots of alternates are added which is also less digestible.

Formulation Tips

  • Keep DEB levels over 220 in summer
  • Increase DEB with Salt, Soda bicarbonate, Potassium Chloride addition
  • DEB is higher for high Soya based diet
  • If alternate ingredients are used more add salts to balance DEB
  • Addition of electrolytes through water can also help in temporary basis

Figure2

Other Additives
There are some additives which have a significant role to play under heat stress. These additives can assure you a high ROI and are worth including in feed. Other essential additive levels need to be increased based on feed consumption. All Vitamin and Mineral levels need to be increased by 10-20% during summer stress so that even if bird consumes less feed, these essential nutrient levels are maintained in birds. Storage of vitamins, enzymes, and probiotics in a cooler place of feed mill avoids the efficacy loss due to environmental extremities.

Inclusion of Vitamin C and Vitamin E at a level of 100-200 ppm is recommended for stress relief and immunity. Similarly, minerals like Manganese (Mn), selenium (Se) and zinc (Zn) plays key role in improving immunity. Supplementation with Vitamin D3 is useful during summer stress to fulfil any deficit of calcium absorption and for better bone mineralization. Choline chloride dosage may be increased during summer stress to ensure effective utilization of fat & nutrients, prevent fatty liver & partial methyl donor effects. Addition of betaine that acts as a methyl donor and maintain osmotic balance of body will be useful as an on-top application during intense summer stress. Some anti-coccidial decrease tolerance to heat and some depresses water intake. These should be avoided for summers. Nicarbazine and Monensin are not suggested to use. Other additives which always aids are immunomodulators, emulsifiers, probiotics, gut health promotors, broad spectrum toxin binders and enzymes.

Formulation Tips

  • Increase Vitamin and Mineral levels by 10-20%
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Vitamin D3, Choline and Betaine inclusion is beneficial
  • Anticoccidials Nicarbazine and Monensin needs to be avoided
  • Storage of additives needs to be done at a cooler place
  • Immunomodulators, probiotics, enzymes, emulsifiers, broad spectrum toxin binders etc. are always helpful

Previous Article By Author: Lameness In Broilers Simplified

Novel Life ConsultantFor references, questions and feedback write to Novel Life Consultants, Bangalore. Email id is novellife.bangalore@gmail.com and contact no Landline 080-41326221 Mob- 96113-37444

(This article is a work of Novel Life Consultant and is for public information purpose only. This has been written to share knowledge on poultry nutrition and is not a legal information or statement. Reference to any specific product or entity doesn’t constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the company. The views expressed by the writer are their own and their appearance does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent.)

Whenever a poultry producer faces a problem of lameness, he points his fingers towards feed and the nutritionist. Fig2We come across many poultry farmers changing feed suppliers/ integrators once they face the challenge of lameness. Culls as called in local language should be limited to maximum 1% during entire rearing of broilers. In this issue of Poultry Nutrition Bites, we will try to address lameness/culls in broilers and how can it be addressed.

Lameness can have a nutritional, viral, bacterial or traumatic etiology. Asking questions only about feed source, access to feed and changes in feed and its formulation is not sufficient. There can be bacterial and viral infections behind lameness in commercial poultry.

Table

Rule out the infectious factors:

As bacteria (particularly Staphylococcus species) can enter the birds well before the onset of clinical lameness, a full history, including early chick quality, the donor source, scratching injuries, respiratory insults, gut health issues (including the quality of the water) and traumatic tendon damage should be recorded. Chicks source or parent information is important for assessing potential viral etiology and genetic predispositions. Understanding the rapidity of the growth rate and modifications (such as light programs) is important information. It is important to determine the root cause of infection if Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli are involved. They can enter the blood stream through the skin, the respiratory tract, the intestinal tract or during incubation or hatching.

Birds with lameness can often present with varying signs. At least 15 birds with typical clinical signs should be Fig2necropsied. Starting at the feet, note the condition of the footpads, any joint swelling (pus or serous fluid), the thickness and firmness of the gastrocnemius tendon, and any erosions in the hips. Slice the top of the hock from the medial side to inspect cartilage formation for dyschondroplasia. Bend the tibia to detect reduced bone strength, which will be affected in rickets. Open the abdomen and check for lesions, especially around the air sacs. Check the keel for breast blisters. Check the sciatic nerve if lameness caused by Marek’s disease is suspected. With a sharp surgical blade slice ventrally through the spinal column to look for abscesses, which can be found on the free thoracic vertebrae. Check other joints, such as those of the wing, for swelling or abnormal fluid. Note the findings in each bird to determine the predominant cause. If a bacterial etiology is suspected, swab the affected joints and place the swabs in bacterial transport medium. Collect blood samples from 10 birds for serology. Collect feed and water samples. If feed retention samples are kept by the farm, collect samples from the time when leg problems were first noted.

As lameness due to bacterial infection can often be chronic, antimicrobial treatment will often not resolve the problem. Infection will often be secondary to other causes and the penetration of antimicrobials to the sites of infection is often poor. Label directions for food-producing animal usage must still be taken into consideration. The exception to this will be when Mycoplasma synoviae or Pasteurella multocida are involved. The parent history and other signs in the birds should help differentiate these from other causes, such as Staphylococcus
aureus. Nutritional stress can also trigger bacterial infections. This stress may be due to an inadequate diet, but any factor that inhibits feed intake in some or all birds in the flock can be responsible.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be performed to ensure that the most efficacious antimicrobial is used. A number of antimicrobials, including Amoxicillin, Erythromycin, Tylosin, Oxytetracycline, and Chlortetracycline have been used to treat acute and subacute infections. Clinically affected birds respond well.

Infectious causes behind lameness must be diagnosed. Root cause behind lameness coming from Parents, Hatchery (temperature), Poultry house must be corrected. Use of specific anti-microbial can be a short-term flock specific measure.

Verify Nutritional factors:

Calcium, Phosphorus and minerals are critical for lameness issues and a good nutritionist always double checks these levels in formulation. Indian nutritionist follows the below levels for broiler formulation.

Table 2

Optimum Total Calcium to Available P ratio should be between 2.0-2.2 to 1. Though these ratios are not that significant with precise nutrition in current times. The levels in the table are including matrix offered by Phytase suppliers. Calcium concentration may vary by 10% depending upon limestone sources, particle size and solubility. Phosphorus availability is considered 85% from DCP and MBM and 100% from MCP. Average TDS of Indian farm water 1000 and at this level’s calcium concentration is 200mg/L. Birds take 2.5-4 times water against feed in summer. A correction of 5-10% in feed Ca levels needs to be applied considering this.

LamenessExcess Ca in diets depress feed intake, growth rate. Trials across the world have proven that. Indian farming is full of stress and infections. Including acidifiers in feed is a common practice in India to lower pH. Increasing Ca levels in feed increases pH of crop and digesta in the small intestine. The beneficial effect of acidifier is minimized by this. To increase feed density nutritionist generally increase oil levels in summer. Excess Ca levels in diets form soap with oil/fats and lowers its digestion and absorption.

Calcium from Limestone is usually soluble in proximate gut and acts as a bridge in the lower GIT to bind protein. This leads to improper digestion and undigested particles in droppings, a huge issue in summers. Ca has negative interaction with other minerals (P, Mg, Mn and Zn) means if you keep Ca levels higher you need to keep mineral levels high in premix, especially these four. Calcium levels lowers down Phytase efficacy. Excess Ca level in diet increases anti-nutritional effect of Phytate as 1 IP6 can bind with 6 Ca ions. These extra Ca in diet forms insoluble Phytates which is less accessible to Phytase enzyme. Higher level of Ca phytate bindings leads to reduced protein and aa digestibility. Excess Ca in diet depress P digestibility. +0.1% Calcium levels can decrease P digestibility by 4%. When higher Ca levels are used make sure not to take higher matrix of amino acids from Phytase enzymes.

Analyzing at practical Calcium and Available Phosphorus levels in Indian diets, Phytase levels must be included to a minimum of 1000 FYT/kg of feed. Calcium shouldn’t be kept very high fearing lameness as this may have a negative impact on so many performance parameters.

Nutritional causes behind lameness can be due to underfeeding or overfeeding of minerals. Once lameness is seen in the flock, its not a correct way to increase Calcium and Phosphorus levels without analyzing other causes. Mineral sources need to be analyzed for content and availability. Use of Phytase is very critical and it can have a direct role in nutritional cause behind lameness.

For references, questions and feedback write to Novel Life Consultants, Bangalore. Email id is novellife.bangalore@gmail.com and contact no Landline 080-41326221 Mob- 9611337444).

 

Novel Life Consultant (This article is a work of Novel Life Consultant and is for public information purpose only. This has been written to share knowledge on poultry nutrition and is not a legal information or statement. Reference to any specific product or entity doesn’t constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the company. The views expressed by the writer are their own and their appearance does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent.)

Broiler performance is graded in India by comparing Average body weight, Average day gain, FCR, CFCRs, Livability and EEF/PPI (European Efficiency Factor or Poultry Performance Index). 9 out of 10 Poultry Production companies in India work on performance optimization. They formulate very high-density feed so that they can grow birds to be marketed early say at 32 to 35 days with very low FCRs (some getting even below 1.4). They celebrate these achievements and proudly share this performance in forum and medias.
There are also some poultry producers who work on Profit optimization. Their performance is average to low, but they make good profits silently. They don’t pat their backs for good performance and achievement but are growing month on month in their business.

Impact of 1-point FCR difference:

Let’s start by calculating what is the impact of 1-point FCR. The cost of 1-point FCR depends upon the cost at which feed has been made and reference FCR. For e.g., the same 1-point FCR cost will be higher for feed calculated at ₹30/kg than at ₹29/kg. Similarly cost of 1-point FCR will be higher when reference FCR is 1.5 than it is 1.6 or above.

Equations used to calculate are:

Current FCR * Feed cost per kg = Feed cost per live kg
Feed cost per live kg/Projected FCR = Future feed Value
Future feed value – Original feed cost = Cost of 1-Point FCR in ₹

(Figure 1 – Cost of 1-Point FCR in different field perspectives)

In the above table, cost impact of 1-Point FCR at different feed cost and standard reference FCR is mentioned in ₹. From the table is can be made out that if feed cost is ₹30/kg and someone getting 1.60 FCR for his farm cost of 1-Point FCR is ₹0.19 or 19 paisa in terms of Feed costing.(Figure 1 – Cost of 1-Point FCR in different field perspectives)

Production cost and margin impact:

Similar mathematical modeling can be applied for calculation of production cost as well as profit optimization also. Assuming current chicks’ price ₹45/unit (its high but this is the prevailing rate), management cost ₹4/bird and standard liquidation/selling weight 2.2kg/bird production cost has been calculated at various feed rates.

(Figure 2 – Broiler Production cost/kg in different field perspectives)

One thing which can be clearly made out from the table is, for profit optimization only better (lower) FCR is not important but also formulation cost. For someone formulating very high-density feed at ₹32/kg and getting 1.50 FCR will have production cost of ₹70.27 whereas moderate density feed formulated at ₹28/kg and getting FCR 1.70 will have production cost of ₹69.87 and will run with more profits.

Some field veterinarians may disagree to this calculation as they have observed more mortality and field challenges with birds growing slowly. They complain of issues related to gut health, respiratory tract after 20 days and feel good when birds are liquidated at 33-35 days. But with good gut health and respiratory infection prevention plan in place, disease challenges can be easily managed. Also, production is a big stress in birds, slow growing birds are less prone to immunosuppression and metabolic disorders. Lower Average Day Gain doesn’t always mean higher mortality which can also be corelated to broiler grown on welfare norms and free range in western world.

Interpretation and commercial use:

  1. Better performance may not always be better profits, the correct approach must be followed for profit optimization.
  2. Integrators with limited farming and very stringent farm selection can go with performance optimization approach.
  3. Integrators with operations across multiple states and looking for expansions should always work on the profit optimization model. The density of feed should be medium to low so that the impact of 1-Point FCR is also less.
  4. In pockets with very high density of poultry population, the performance of same feed across farms depending upon management is 20-30 Points FCR. For these areas profit optimization concept works the best.(Figure 3 –Line graph demonstrating FCR, PC and Feed Cost)
  5. Additives pertaining to gut health, disease needs not to be compromised while formulating feeds at a lower cost. Good health monitoring and management practices are always helpful in keeping diseases at bay.
  6. Lower to medium density feed can be formulated at a lower cost but the things to keep in mind is the percentage inclusion of alternate ingredients. Minimizing the variation in raw ingredients through good quality control process and use of suitable enzymes are giving edge to the poultry producers following this approach in India.
  7. Top 2 out of 3 Indian Integrators are successfully following profit optimization approach and they are satisfied with average performance.

For references, questions and feedback write to Novel Life Consultants, Bangalore. Email id is novellife.bangalore@gmail.com and contact no Landline 080-41326221 Mob- 9611337444)

 

(This article is a work of Novel Life Consultant and is for public information purpose only. This has been written to share knowledge on poultry nutrition and is not a legal information or statement. Reference to any specific product or entity doesn’t constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the company. The views expressed by the writer are their own and their appearance does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent.)

Its January and winter chills have started. For broiler farmers in India winter management of poultry is all about Curtain management, Brooding, Space management and Litter management. If heating of houses and curtain management is well enough, the litter is dry and performance is good. Mismanagement of these can have a typically moist condition within the farm during winter; gut health can also be more affected by coccidiosis, enteric bacteria and viral challenges. In many cases, the nutritionist tries to help maintain performance through feed manipulations, but it is not as powerful as providing good heat and air. To summarize the nutritionist and farm manager must work together in an integrated way to keep performance from slipping during the cold part of the year.

Below are some of the strategies for formulating feed for next 3 months.

Cold weather ME levels in Feed: Some nutritionist increases the ME levels (not protein) in winters so that there is no increased feed intake by birds for heat production. Extra calories are provided to offset environment related bird heat loss maintaining constant feed intake, growth and FCR. Research suggest higher energy feed resulted in less water intake, most likely due to lower feed intake. This becomes important as we battle litter moisture during the cold seasons.

  • 40-50 kcal/kg ME can be enhanced in winter formulations by use of lipids.

Figure 1

Mineral and electrolyte adjustment: First step should be to reduce the Sodium in feed due to increased litter moisture. It is well documented that lower Sodium can reduce water intake, water excretion and litter moisture. Keeping Na levels around 0.18% for early diets and 0.16% for later diets including additive (Phytase) matrix is useful.

Figure2

Slightly lower Ca and Av P levels in cold weather will also have a positive impact. Reduction in levels should be rational. Trace mineral supplementation also should be rational as per breed requirement. Excess feeding that too in Inorganic form must be stopped for winters.

  • Sodium, Calcium, Available Phosphorus and trace mineral levels needs to be tapered down while formulating for winters.

Replacing soybean with animal protein: Many nutritionists have experienced performance improvement and better litter conditions when they replaced a portion of Soymeal with a reliable MBM, Poultry Meal. NSP levels in Soymeal along with high K level creates stresses on the intestinal tracts. Generally, if Soymeal is reduced below 30% in starters and 25% in finishers using animal protein with all amino acid balanced will give better performance and drier litter. For someone making veg feed, replacement of Soymeal with Rapeseed, MGM, DDGS etc. can be helpful as these are lower K substitutes for Soymeal.

  • Replacement of a portion of Soymeal with animal protein or others protein ingredient enhances performance in winters.

Crude protein and amino acid adjustmentsLow protein diets are beneficial in winters. Higher protein diets will result in higher water intake, more water excretion and higher depositions of nitrogen in the litter.

Figure3

Multiple studies have indicated that slightly lower protein feeds seem to reduce gut insults, especially during cold weather, where possibly housing out-time is limited. Use of Multi-Protease can help significantly in lowering down protein levels without effecting performance.

  • Formulating low protein diets with Multi-Protease is economic and performs best in winters.

To conclude, maintaining cold weather performance is difficult and can only be accomplished with an integrated approach by several people. The supervisor, farmer, field veterinarian and nutritionist must all spend time on the farms evaluating and discussing the best steps to take from each area of expertise. Working together, good performance can be a reality in cold weather.

For references, questions and feedback write to Novel Life Consultants, Bangalore. Email id is novellife.bangalore@gmail.com and contact no Landline +91-(0)80-41326221 Mob- +91-96113-37444)

(This article is a work of Novel Life Consultant and is for public information purpose only. This has been written to share knowledge on poultry nutrition and is not a legal information or statement. Reference to any specific product or entity doesn’t constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the company. The views expressed by the writer are their own and their appearance does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent.)